Aksi Marsovich
Intergalactic expert
In a world where mobile traffic has overtaken desktop surfing. Where phones are no longer used only for spying on exes on social networks and posting your child, dog and dog's child on Instagram. It was in that era when companies realized the importance of communicating with customers via smartphones that they lived, three types of web development for mobile active telegram number data devices: Mobile application, Mobile version, and Nif-Nif-Adaptive.
These brothers, similar at first glance, differed in the complexity of their development, goals and, accordingly, price.
Mobile version of the site
The mobile version of the site is a separately developed site with its own subdomain, to which the smart machine automatically redirects the gray Wolf if it sees that he is sitting on a phone or tablet. It is developed for devices with a screen less than 620px and is filled with only really important information, without overloading with content, design and often cool, but unnecessary navigation elements. Everything is hardcore - no fluff. We shoot point-blank at the Wolf's desire to buy and "eat".
Why do the grey furry ones like to use mobile versions so much? It's simple. In the literal sense of the word "simple".
The maximum simplification of the site allows you to find the fattest pig, order it, receive it and gobble it up in just a couple of clicks. Maximum satiety for a minimum of actions. No need to rummage through a forest of buttons, pages, animations and other chaff.
The pages load almost instantly and consume a minimum of Internet traffic due to the lightening of all elements. This is important at the moment when you have 50 megabytes of package Internet left, and you urgently need to find that very “super ring” as a gift for the She-Wolf, the link to which she has been accidentally sending you on WhatsApp for 2 months.
Compared to a mobile app, it doesn't turn a predator into prey, taking away the phone's memory, which is always in short supply for funny pictures and photos.
The mobile version has its own disadvantages, and quite a few of them.
Convenience and easy accessibility to the site turns into an additional expense item. It is not enough to simply develop two autonomous sites, they need to be supported. Not like a friend supports, clapping you on the shoulder and saying "everything will be fine", but with a penny. Always multiply the costs of changes in the project concept by two, otherwise you risk losing the audience of the mobile or desktop version, which will not see the changes.
Simplifying the site can also play a cruel joke. It is not a fact that the lightweight version will cover all the needs of the Wolf. What if he wants to examine the piglet from all sides in a 3D model before buying?
Even the presence of a mobile and web version of the site does not mean that the project is perfect. Perfect is when there is also a version for tablets, retina displays and TV. Is it too much trouble to do everything?