m 3: 2.9 So what's most important? There's a highe usa email database r number of average reviews for the top 3 than the bottom, but the #1 listing for 'San Diego Acupuncture' has none! Distance from the city center seems pretty consistent and average # of user content items is pretty close, so what kind of information can you derive from this? Well lets keep moving onto the next case study and I'll tie it all in at the end.
Here is the data analysis for 'San Diego SEO', my competition. (my site is #7 in this list) Keywords entered into business listing As expected, the user controlled aspects of the top 10 local listings are pretty well optimized across the board so the true differences must be in the Google controlled aspects, correct? Quantifiable Listing Facts avg # web sites for top 3: 5 avg # web sites for bottom 3: 2.6 avg user content for top 3: .