anxiety about society's
Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2024 10:07 am
I don't want to talk about the stock issue because I know you apologized and corrected it. But if they have concerns, shouldn't they be allowed to express them? I know different people have different views. : Of course we think the debate is very important. It's also very important to be able to express these concerns publicly and discuss safety issues. We have been very open about the issue of disinformation since the founding of Google, and this was one of the issues we studied early on. The technological progress in the past few years has been incredible and faster than expected.
This has also increased people's general science is going, so japan cell phone number it's understandable that people are worried about the future. Specifically, the work we have done at Google and the way we have deployed these models, I think we have an excellent team, and we have deployed these models very safely, which I am very proud of. Given the speed of technological advancement and our own progress, it's important to focus on security and protect the framework. We need to think about how we think about the risks of training and deploying cutting-edge models.
Moderator: You mentioned these issues. I wonder why there is a need for non-disclosure agreements and stricter regulations than other companies? The open letter was issued after a series of high-profile departures, including Jk and k. They led the alignment team responsible for security. Jk was a co-founder. He was ousted along with three other directors, but k posted this message on : "Over the past year, the security culture and processes have been replaced by shiny new products." This is one of the most persistent criticisms of . Do you think this is fair? Why or why not? If you say you take security very seriously and they say you don't, how do you respond to this criticism? : First of all, the alignment team is not the only team responsible for security.
This has also increased people's general science is going, so japan cell phone number it's understandable that people are worried about the future. Specifically, the work we have done at Google and the way we have deployed these models, I think we have an excellent team, and we have deployed these models very safely, which I am very proud of. Given the speed of technological advancement and our own progress, it's important to focus on security and protect the framework. We need to think about how we think about the risks of training and deploying cutting-edge models.
Moderator: You mentioned these issues. I wonder why there is a need for non-disclosure agreements and stricter regulations than other companies? The open letter was issued after a series of high-profile departures, including Jk and k. They led the alignment team responsible for security. Jk was a co-founder. He was ousted along with three other directors, but k posted this message on : "Over the past year, the security culture and processes have been replaced by shiny new products." This is one of the most persistent criticisms of . Do you think this is fair? Why or why not? If you say you take security very seriously and they say you don't, how do you respond to this criticism? : First of all, the alignment team is not the only team responsible for security.