I like these three questions: Does the organization offering the link tout SEO, PageRank
Posted: Sun Dec 22, 2024 7:02 am
Customizable anchor text or Google rankings as either a portion or the whole of the benefit you'll receive by paying this money? Does the money go towards little else besides the link itself? Does the organization/website provide links via this acquisition methodology (whether that's an event sponsorship, a charitable donation, an advertising relationship, etc.) to the more aggressive side of the SEO/web marketing field (niches like porn, pills, casino, legal, real estate, etc.
) often with anchor text heavy links? If the answer t taiwan email list o any of these is a definite "yes," the source is likely to fit into Google's "suspicious" pile and possibly will lose the ability to pass link equity in the future (or already has). How can you be sure that linkbait and viral content won't be treated the same as paid links by Google in the future? Just a couple months back, I wrote about Why Linkbait is a Tactic the Search Engines Will Always Value, so it's probably not worth re-hashing here.
Certainly, there are ways to be manipulative about virtually anything in the link acquisition world, and Google may well take action against some forms of these, but I believe natural links acquired through great content are going to stand the test of time (and are likely to benefit from future ranking signals, whatever they may be). This is just Google FUD - we shouldn't let them dictate how to do our jobs! But we already do! The only reason we try to build these links, research the right keywords, create and submit XML sitemaps, etc.
) often with anchor text heavy links? If the answer t taiwan email list o any of these is a definite "yes," the source is likely to fit into Google's "suspicious" pile and possibly will lose the ability to pass link equity in the future (or already has). How can you be sure that linkbait and viral content won't be treated the same as paid links by Google in the future? Just a couple months back, I wrote about Why Linkbait is a Tactic the Search Engines Will Always Value, so it's probably not worth re-hashing here.
Certainly, there are ways to be manipulative about virtually anything in the link acquisition world, and Google may well take action against some forms of these, but I believe natural links acquired through great content are going to stand the test of time (and are likely to benefit from future ranking signals, whatever they may be). This is just Google FUD - we shouldn't let them dictate how to do our jobs! But we already do! The only reason we try to build these links, research the right keywords, create and submit XML sitemaps, etc.